Submissions

Login or Register to make a submission.

Author Guidelines

Academic Achievement Review (AAR) is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access scholarly journal committed to publishing original, high-quality research that contributes meaningfully to academic knowledge and professional practice.

The journal welcomes submissions from researchers, academicians, professionals, policymakers, librarians, educators, scientists, and practitioners worldwide.

Authors should ensure that submitted manuscripts:

·       are original and unpublished;

·       are not under consideration by another journal;

·       comply with internationally accepted standards of publication ethics;

·       follow the journal's formatting and referencing guidelines;

·       contain accurate data and appropriate citations;

·       clearly state research objectives, methodology, findings, and conclusions.

All submissions undergo an initial editorial assessment followed by a rigorous double-blind peer review process.

The Editorial Board reserves the right to reject manuscripts that fall outside the journal's scope or fail to meet academic and ethical standards.

Authors are encouraged to consult all journal policies before submitting their manuscripts.

Official Submission Resources

To confirm consistency, transparency, and compliance with international scholarly publishing standards, authors are requested to prepare their submissions using the official documents provided by Academic Achievement Review.

Carefully review the journal's submission requirements and download the relevant files before submitting your manuscript. Properly prepared submissions facilitate a faster editorial assessment and peer-review process.

A. Manuscript Preparation

Please prepare your manuscript using the official AAR manuscript template.

·       Download: AAR Manuscript Template (.docx)

·       Download: AAR Manuscript Template (.pdf)

B. Mandatory Submission Forms

The following documents should be completed and submitted along with the manuscript wherever applicable.

·       Download: Author Declaration & Originality Statement

·       Download: Copyright Agreement

·       Download: Artificial Intelligence (AI) Use Disclosure Form

·       Download: Cover Letter Template

C. Similarity and Academic Integrity

Academic Achievement Review is committed to maintaining the highest standards of publication ethics and research integrity.

Authors are strongly encouraged to verify the originality of their manuscripts prior to submission using any recognised similarity checking service available through their institution or organisation.

Where such facilities are not available, authors should make every reasonable effort to ensure that the manuscript is free from plagiarism, duplicate publication, and improper citation practices.

The Editorial Office reserves the right to conduct editorial screening and request clarification or additional documentation whenever necessary.

D. Competing Interests

Authors are required to disclose any financial, professional, institutional, or personal relationships that could reasonably be perceived as influencing the research or its interpretation.

If no competing interests exist, authors should state:

“The authors declare that they have no competing interests.”

This declaration promotes transparency and helps maintain the integrity of the scholarly publication process.

E. Need Assistance?

If you experience any difficulty during submission or require editorial assistance, please contact the Editorial Office.

If you experience any difficulty during submission or require editorial assistance, please contact the Editorial Office.

·       E-mail at: info@daibabani.in

·       Visit Website: https://journals.daibabani.in

Submission Preparation Checklist

  The manuscript is original and has not been published previously.

☐  The manuscript is not under review by another journal.

☐  All authors have approved the submitted version.

  The manuscript follows the journal's formatting guidelines.

☐  The title, abstract, and keywords have been carefully reviewed.

  References are complete, accurate, and cited consistently.

☐  Tables and figures are numbered and properly cited.

☐  Ethical approval has been obtained where required.

  Conflicts of interest have been disclosed.

  Funding information has been provided where applicable.

  Supplementary files have been uploaded if necessary.

  The manuscript file has been anonymised for double-blind peer review.

Articles

Academic Achievement Review (AAR) publishes high-quality scholarly contributions that advance knowledge across multidisciplinary academic fields. All submissions must present original work, demonstrate academic rigor, and contribute meaningfully to research, education, policy, or professional practice.

The journal accepts several categories of manuscripts to accommodate diverse forms of scholarly communication.

Recommended manuscript length: 4,000–8,000 words (excluding references, tables, and appendices).

Research Articles

Research Articles present original findings derived from systematic investigation using quantitative, qualitative, mixed-method, experimental, theoretical, or computational approaches.

Manuscripts should clearly describe:

·       research objectives;

·       literature review;

·       methodology;

·       analysis and results;

·       discussion;

·       conclusions;

·       implications for future research and practice.

Submissions must demonstrate methodological soundness, originality, ethical integrity, and scholarly significance.

All Research Articles undergo a rigorous double-blind peer-review process before editorial decisions are made.

Recommended length: 5,000–8,000 words.

Review Articles

Review Articles provide comprehensive, critical, and balanced analyses of existing knowledge within a particular research domain.

Suitable review manuscripts include:

·       Systematic Reviews

·       Scoping Reviews

·       Narrative Reviews

·       Meta-analyses

·       State-of-the-Art Reviews

Reviews should identify research trends, knowledge gaps, theoretical developments, methodological advances, and future research priorities.

Authors should employ recognised review methodologies wherever appropriate and provide transparent reporting of search strategies and selection criteria.

Recommended length: 6,000–10,000 words.

Short Communications

Short Communications report concise but significant research findings, methodological innovations, preliminary results, technical notes, or emerging ideas deserving rapid dissemination.

These manuscripts should present:

·       a clearly defined research question;

·       reliable methodology;

·       concise analysis;

·       meaningful conclusions.

Short Communications undergo the same rigorous peer-review process as full-length articles.

Recommended length: 2,000–3,500 words.

Case Studies

Case Studies present in-depth examinations of significant events, institutional practices, educational initiatives, technological implementations, community interventions, organisational experiences, or policy developments.

Submissions should include:

·       contextual background;

·       objectives;

·       methodology;

·       observations or findings;

·       critical analysis;

·       lessons learned;

·       recommendations.

Case studies should demonstrate clear practical relevance and provide insights transferable to broader academic or professional contexts.

Recommended length: 3,000–6,000 words.

Book Reviews

Book Reviews critically evaluate recently published scholarly books relevant to the journal's scope.

Reviews should assess:

·       originality;

·       contribution to the discipline;

·       methodological approach;

·       organisation and clarity;

·       strengths and limitations;

·       relevance for researchers, educators, professionals, and students.

Reviews should maintain an objective, balanced, and constructive tone while offering informed scholarly commentary.

Recommended length: 1,000–2,000 words.

Letters to the Editor

Letters to the Editor provide a forum for scholarly discussion, constructive criticism, professional observations, and academic dialogue relating to previously published articles or emerging issues relevant to the journal's scope.

Letters should:

·       present reasoned academic arguments;

·       maintain respectful and professional language;

·       be supported by appropriate references where necessary;

·       contribute meaningfully to scholarly discussion.

Letters may be published at the discretion of the Editorial Board and may be accompanied by responses from the original authors where appropriate.

Recommended length: 500–1,500 words.

Privacy Statement

The Academic Achievement Review (AAR), published by DaibaBani, is committed to maintaining the highest standards of data protection, privacy, and confidentiality across its digital publishing workflows. The data collected from registered users of this journal site falls within the scope of standard operations for peer-reviewed, open-access scholarly journals.

1. Collection and Scope of Personal Data

To facilitate the submission, peer review, and publication processes, AAR collects essential personal data, which may include:

  • Full Name, Institutional Affiliation, and Country.
  • Contact details (including Primary and Alternative Institutional Email addresses).
  • Research profiles, academic interests, metadata keyword tags, and ORCID iDs.

2. Purpose and Processing of Personal Data

The names, affiliations, and email addresses entered into this journal site will be used exclusively for the explicitly stated operational purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or shared with third parties. Specifically, data is collected to:

  • Track, evaluate, and guide manuscripts through the Double-Blind Peer Review workflow.
  • Communicate editorial decisions, revisions, copyediting requests, and production proofs.
  • Accurately publish author metadata alongside final open-access papers to guarantee clear global citation harvesting and discoverability (via Crossref, DOAJ, and Google Scholar).
  • Invite qualified registered users to act as domain-specific external peer reviewers.

3. Data Protection and Third-Party Disclosure

The Editorial Office of AAR and the technical administration at DaibaBani enforce strict digital access boundaries. Your data will never be sold, bartered, or leased to third-party marketing entities, commercial networks, or external service providers. Information is only visible to authorized editorial participants (Editors, Section Editors, and Technical Production Managers) strictly on a need-to-know basis to preserve the confidentiality of the peer-review pipeline.

4. Scholarly Integrity and Long-Term Archiving

In accordance with COPE-aligned publication ethics and international open-access infrastructure requirements, basic bibliographic metadata associated with published articles (including author names, affiliations, and ORCID records) forms a permanent historical public ledger. This permanent scholarly record cannot be modified or removed post-publication to protect the tracking integrity of international citation networks and preservation services (such as PKP PN, LOCKSS, or CLOCKSS).

5. User Rights

All registered users maintain full control over their private profile information via their OJS dashboard. You may log in at any time to modify your contact parameters, alter your reviewing preferences, or withdraw your account from active editorial consideration by contacting the Editorial Office directly at info@daibabani.in.